Ally Iseman

Ally Iseman Exploring stigmas through the lens of comedy in order to create a catalyst for conversation.

Global Thought Leader on Modern Desire in Relationships | Speaker · Author · Advisor · TV Host · Relationship Coach | Debut book: For the Love of Jealousy (Round House Literary) For comedy TV audiences, development executives, and showrunners committed to diverse storytelling, Ally Iseman is a conversation starter among multi-hyphenate creators because of her desire to lift up underrepresented voices and bring a new perspective to unexplored and difficult topics. Ally writes fast, thrives in collaboration, and brings her background as an actor to her sharp dialogue and multilayered character development. A team player who lifts others up alongside herself, Ally crafts entertaining and compelling narratives that add depth and dimension to the comedic landscape. Ally is a modern triple threat actor, writer, and co-founder of the digital educational platform and consulting company Film Launch. A Finalist in the 2020 WeScreenplay Diverse Voices Competition and Top 3 writer on The Bitch List 2020, Ally has spoken on numerous panels about gender parity and inclusive feminism, aligning herself with work that has an eye on advocacy. She has worked on stage in productions like Jekyll & Hyde where she portrayed four different characters with just as many dialects, as well as on screens big and small including shows like American Housewife, Criminal Minds, and NCIS: Los Angeles. She stars starring opposite Lake Bell, Amy Landecker, Michaela Watkins, Rob Huebel, Jeff Garlin and others in her gender parity comedy series Flip The Script, which became Women In Film’s first original content. With her company Film Launch, she educates and empowers content entrepreneurs, helps films successfully launch into the marketplace, and consults with entertainment companies looking to pivot, launch, or grow their brand.

09/15/2026

We define relationship success by length alone.

50 years together. Congratulations! … but they were miserable for 45 of them.

Length is not a measure of depth. Not in physics. Not in relationships.

The measures that actually tell you something: Security. Consistency. Do their words match their actions? Do they show up the way they say they will? Are you always looking out for each other? Is your nervous system regulated in their presence — or are you perpetually braced for something?

That last one is underrated. A regulated nervous system in relationship is one of the quietest, most honest signals that something is actually working. Not the length of time. Not the milestone list. The felt sense of safety that builds slowly, through repeated small moments of someone showing up exactly as they said they would.

That’s the measure. Not the anniversary. The accumulation of evidence that you are safe with this person — and they are safe with you.

Save this and send it to someone who’s been measuring the wrong thing.



09/14/2026

I stayed single longer than usual to see what was on the other side.

The answer was all of my own sh/t. Waiting for me.

Not fun. Absolutely worth it.

Because when I started dating again — still monogamous at that point — I understood more about what I actually wanted. What excited me. What I was curious about. And I could start bringing that into the conversation, awkwardly at first, but I could do it.

That’s when things started to shift. Not because I had it all figured out. Because I’d stopped pretending I didn’t have preferences.

Compersion — the joy or pleasure you feel from your partner experiencing joy or pleasure with someone else — was a word I didn’t have yet. Polyamory was a word I didn’t have yet. I was navigating by feel, making every mistake available, with no map and no language for where I was trying to go.

The self-awareness came first. The language came later. Both mattered.

Save this as a reminder that the inner work isn’t a detour from your love life. It’s the foundation of it.



09/13/2026

More people aren’t necessarily practising consensual non-monogamy than before. More people feel safe enough to say so.
That’s an important distinction.

I’ll say this with confidence: whoever is reading this has more people in their life who have been, or currently are, in some form of consensual non-monogamy than they realise. Not because it’s suddenly everywhere. Because it’s always been there — quietly, privately, without the language or the visibility or the sense that it was something you were allowed to claim.

What’s changed is representation.

Social media giving us windows into other ways of living. People talking about it openly who look like the people watching.

When someone who reminds you of yourself — or someone in your life — is talking about it plainly, it stops being threatening and starts being possible.

The question was never whether this existed. It was whether you’d ever see yourself in it.

Comment QUIZ and I’ll send you my free Relationship Style Quiz — sometimes seeing your own reflection in something clearly is the first step.



09/12/2026

You can be s3xually exclusive-minded and emotionally non-exclusive-minded, or the exact opposite, and most people never realize those are two separate settings, not one.

We conflate s3xual needs and emotional needs constantly, like they’re one dial instead of two. Knowing where you actually land on both isn’t a label, it’s information that turns dating from a checklist into an actual conversation:

“Here’s what I’m available for. What are you available for, is there a match?”

No losing, no failing. Just an inquiry.

Comment QUIZ and I’ll send you my free Relationship Style Quiz to find out exactly where you land.

There’s a specific kind of comfort that used to feel like safety and now feels like furniture.You know exactly how the e...
09/11/2026

There’s a specific kind of comfort that used to feel like safety and now feels like furniture.

You know exactly how the evening will go. You love this person. And something that used to move has gone very still.

That’s not a relationship verdict. That’s your nervous system doing exactly what it was designed to do — and it’s more fixable than you think.

Here’s what I cover in this month’s piece:

the full spectrum from dirty talk to soft swinging,

k/nk demystified,

and the conversation you need to have before any of it — that most couples never have.

What’s one thing on your “someday maybe” list you’ve never actually said out loud to your partner?

Comment SUB0926 and I’ll send you the link to read the full article.

09/09/2026

S/xual needs and emotional needs are not the same dial. Most people have never separated them, which is exactly why one-size-fits-all relationship advice fits almost nobody.

High s/xual exclusivity, low emotional exclusivity. Low on both. High on both. Every combination in between. That’s four distinct relationship styles, and most people have spent their whole dating life assuming there’s only one right answer instead of finding out which one is actually theirs.

If you’re partnered, this is also the conversation worth having together, not just solo — because you might not land in the same style, and that’s exactly the kind of thing you want to know before it becomes a problem, not after.

Comment QUIZ and I’ll send you my free Relationship Style Quiz — get your full Pleasure-led Relationship Profile, your compatible structures, and the roadblocks to watch out for.

🎙️ From my conversation on Cesar Cardona & Foster Wilson

09/08/2026

“Non-monogamous” tells you almost nothing on its own. Neither does “monogamous,” honestly.

These words get treated like finished sentences when they’re really just the opening line.

Someone tells you they’re non-monogamous — that could mean one of a number of completely different structures, each with completely different sets of needs, agreements, and availability.

The actual useful question is never “what’s your label,” it’s “what does that mean for you, specifically, right now?”

Commitment was never really about the label anyway, it’s about consistency, and consistency looks different for every single person, regardless of structure.

📲 Save this before your next conversation about putting a label on it — you’ll ask better questions.

🎙️ From my conversation on Cesar Cardona & Foster Wilson

09/07/2026

Insecurity. Comparison or competition. Fear of abandonment. Distrust.

Those are the four main types of romantic jealousy — and most people have never heard them named, let alone learned to tell them apart.

Here’s why that matters: the work is completely different depending on which one’s actually showing up.

If it’s insecurity, the work is on you, not the relationship — I learned this the hard way last year. A health setback kept me out of the gym, and when jealousy about someone else’s body (comparison/competition) came up, someone my partner was enjoying himself with, I had to get honest that it wasn’t really about them. It was about me missing how vibrant, strong, and fit I used to feel (insecurity).

Nobody did anything wrong. That story was mine to rewrite, and it’s what got me back to taking care of myself.

If it’s distrust, that’s an insecurity in the relationship. Same feeling on the surface, completely different root, completely different work.

Comment JELLY and I’ll send you my free Jealousy Quiz — find out which of the four is actually yours.

🎙️ From my conversation on Cesar Cardona & Foster Wilson

09/06/2026

You don’t ever have to come out.

This can be your private life. Private for your whole life. That is a completely valid choice — and it is yours to make, not anyone else’s.

You might be out with your closest friends but not at work. Out at work but not at home. Out in person but not online.

You get to draw those lines exactly where they make sense for your life, your safety, and your circumstances. Nobody gets to move them for you.

And if you’re someone who is very out — living openly, visible, comfortable — you don’t get to push a partner into doing the same. You don’t get to out them. You don’t get to make their timeline match yours.

If you’re going to be with someone who isn’t out, you need to be genuinely okay with that — not tolerating it while quietly pressuring them toward visibility they aren’t ready for.

When you’re newer to this, it can feel bigger and scarier than it looks from the outside. That’s real. The people who seem unbothered have usually just had more time and more safety to get there.

You don’t owe anyone your story. Not yet. Not ever, if you choose.

Send this to someone who needs permission to take their time.

SITUASEANS PODCAST

09/05/2026

Opening your relationship to avoid a problem is not ENM. It’s avoidance with extra steps.

There are genuine incompatibilities that consensual non-monogamy can help address.

Mismatched libidos.

Different needs for novelty or connection.

Geographical challenges.

K/nk desires that cross a partner’s boundaries.

These are real, and open relationship dynamics can be a genuinely useful structure for navigating them — when both people are honest about what’s actually happening and choose the structure intentionally.

What it cannot do is fix something you’re not willing to look at.

If the real issue is unaddressed resentment, broken trust, or a relationship that has already quietly ended, opening up won’t solve it. It will surface it. Faster and louder than you were prepared for.

And while we’re here: polyamorous people get jealous too. “I’m too jealous for non-monogamy” is not a disqualifier — it’s an untapped resource.

Jealousy, made curious instead of reactive, is one of the most powerful tools for self-knowledge you have access to. The goal isn’t to eliminate it. It’s to lean in and ask what it’s telling you.

Tag someone who needs to hear that ENM isn’t an exit strategy.

SITUASEANS PODCAST

Address

Parlier, CA

Website

,

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ally Iseman posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category