09/09/2026
This is a thought that’s been rattling around my head today.
Can negative golf course reviews create a vicious cycle?
A poor review can create a stigma around a golf club. That stigma could mean fewer visitors, less income and ultimately less money available to invest back into the golf course.
Does that then make it even harder for the course to improve?
Of course, that doesn’t mean golf courses shouldn’t be held accountable. Honest feedback is important and sometimes criticism is exactly what a club needs to identify where it can improve.
But I do think there is often a huge amount of context missing when we judge a golf course purely on the finished product.
Golfers rarely see the weather challenges, staffing issues, machinery breakdowns, rising costs and hundreds of decisions being made behind the scenes every day.
That’s a big part of why I started sharing what happens behind the scenes here. Not to make excuses for poor golf courses, but to give a little more context to what goes into producing the course golfers see when they turn up for their tee time.
And for clarity, this isn’t intended as a dig at any particular creator or review I’ve seen. It simply got me thinking about the wider conversation around how we review golf courses.
I’ve never met a greenkeeper who turns up on a Monday morning with the intention of producing a worse golf course by Friday.
Most are doing the best they can with the weather, resources, budgets and teams they have available.
So genuinely, where do you think the line is?
Constructive criticism that helps a club improve?
Or have we become a little too quick to publicly write somewhere off when things aren’t perfect?
Interested to hear both sides of this one. 👇💭👇