22/06/2026
Back in early 2020, a mutual friend thought Paul Caddy and I should talk. Paul was at the helm of the University of Connecticut (UConn) Field Hockey team, about to embark on his first year as head coach. It was the middle of COVID. Seasons were uncertain, and coaches were looking for new ways to understand and support their athletes. After a few conversations, Paul invited me to profile his team using Changefully, a psychological performance framework I'd been researching and developing since the 1990s.
All the athletes in the squad completed an assessment. From there, I developed an individual performance profile for every athlete, a leadership profile and a Team Performance Report. Together, they created a psychological blueprint of the team before a game had even been played. The report was designed to answer a simple but important question: How is this team most likely to perform when the pressure becomes real?
The assessment identified a talented group with strong leadership, high standards and significant potential. It also suggested that, as pressure increased, confidence, perfectionism, self-judgement and the need to prove themselves were likely to become increasingly influential.
The recommendations were surprisingly simple: Create psychological safety; emphasise learning over judgement; recognise effort before outcomes; keep athletes engaged and active; provide brief, clear instruction; reduce opportunities for overthinking; treat mistakes as information, not identity. In other words, don't just coach the hockey. Coach the environment in which the hockey is played.
Then the season began. UConn finished 12–2 and won the Big East Championship. Looking back now, it isn't the record that interests me most. It's how often the team's psychological profile helped explain what was happening beneath the surface of their performances. The report didn't predict the results. It wasn't supposed to. What it did identify were the psychological conditions under which this particular team was most likely to flourish…and the moments where those conditions were most likely to be tested. That project reinforced something I've believed for more than twenty-five years. Performance data tells us what happened. Psychological insight helps us understand the people behind it. We spend countless hours developing technical skills, tactical systems and physical preparation. Yet the psychological environment in which athletes train and compete is often left to instinct. It doesn't have to be. When talent is equal, understanding how your athletes are most likely to think, connect and perform under pressure may be one of the greatest competitive advantages a coach can have.