20/06/2026
A lot of people walk into interviews with strong experience and still come across less impactful than they actually are.
One of the most common things I see is how quickly answers turn into “we did this” and “we delivered that”, even when their role inside the work was much more specific and much more hands-on than that.
The issue is not honesty. It is that in the moment, it feels easier to blend into the team story than to separate out your own contribution clearly.
But when your part in the work is not clearly named, the interviewer has to do that work for you. And most of the time, they will not slow down to figure it out.
What changes the way your answers land is being able to speak in a way where your role inside the outcome is obvious without needing extra explanation.
If interviews ever feel like you are not fully getting across what you can actually do, this is usually where it starts.
16/06/2026
Most senior leaders go into interviews well prepared.
They know their experience. They've reviewed the brief. They've thought through what they want to say.
And then the pressure hits, and the thinking that felt clear suddenly isn't.
Preparing in your head and performing out loud are two different skills. The second one only improves with practice.
Swipe to see what that looks like in practice. ➡️
14/06/2026
If you've ever walked out of an interview thinking "I didn't explain that well", this might be why.
Most people don't realise how much they use "we" when talking about their own work. It's not wrong. It just makes you invisible.
This small language habit changes the way people assess you in interviews more than most realise.
Especially at the senior level.
Because once your answers become too broad, too shared, or too team-focused, people stop being able to clearly see where you actually sat inside the work.
And when that happens, strong experience can start sounding surprisingly average.
This is one of those things people rarely get told directly, but it changes interviews very quickly once you notice it.
09/06/2026
The way you describe your work to yourself matters more than most people realise.
I have worked with women in leadership who were already operating at a high level but still spoke about their work in a way that made it sound smaller than it was.
The decisions they had led, the complexity they managed, the way they held teams through change, all of it got quietly underplayed in how they told their own story.
Once that language shifts, things start to change quite quickly. Decisions feel clearer, boundaries become easier to hold, and there is less tendency to take on work that was never meant to sit fully on them.
What changes first is not the role or the capability. It is the way they are interpreting what is already true about them.
If you want more insight into the kind of shifts that happen inside my coaching work, you can follow along here 🤍
02/06/2026
A lot of women in leadership are exhausted from trying to manage how they are perceived.
They are careful with every word, overprepare before meetings, and put pressure on themselves to sound confident and composed all the time because they think that is what makes people take them seriously.
At the same time, they are quietly dismissing the qualities that already make them good at what they do.
The ability to stay calm in difficult situations. The ability to listen properly instead of reacting quickly. The ability to notice what is happening in a team before anyone says it out loud.
Genuine care for the work and the people around them.
These are not small things. These are leadership qualities.
I think many women would experience leadership very differently if they stopped measuring themselves against the loudest person in the room and started paying attention to the way people already respond to them, trust them, and feel supported by them.
You do not need to force yourself into someone else’s version of leadership to belong there.
If this felt familiar, I would love to hear your thoughts 🤍